Ready

Mono-Material Recyclable Pump

Prepared/Dec 1, 2024
Read Time/11 min

Executive Summary

The Assessment

Multiple proven approaches already exist for this challenge. Yonwoo commercialized bellows geometry achieving 5,000 cP at 500+ cycles, while Silgan's glass-fiber reinforced PP extends capabilities to an estimated 8,000-10,000 cP. The gap to 10,000+ cP represents engineering optimization rather than invention. The key insight is that high viscosity is a feature, not a bug—when properly leveraging shear-thinning material properties rather than fighting them through over-engineered springs.

Viability

Viable with high confidence using existing approaches

Primary Recommendation

Pursue calibrated orifice squeeze tube with PP duckbill valve as lowest-risk path. Timeline: 3-6 months. Investment: $50-150K. Shear-thinning behavior in cosmetic emulsions reduces effective viscosity from 10,000 cP at rest to 1,000-2,000 cP during flow, enabling 15-25N squeeze force. This approach is proven at 50,000+ cP in oral care—the barrier to premium cosmetics is positioning, not physics. If pump format is required, pursue optimized PP bellows with FEA-designed stress distribution ($200-400K, 12-18 months).

The Brief

Need to replace virgin plastic pumps with mono-material recyclable alternatives that can dispense viscous serums (10,000+ cP) in consistent 0.5mL doses without metal components. Current pumps use metal springs that contaminate recycling streams and prevent circularity.

Problem Analysis

What's Wrong

Current cosmetic pumps rely on metal springs to provide the return force needed for dispensing high-viscosity products. These metal components contaminate plastic recycling streams, preventing true circularity. Replacing metal springs with all-plastic alternatives faces a fundamental materials challenge: polypropylene (PP) has an elastic modulus of only 1.5 GPa compared to 200 GPa for steel—a 130x disadvantage. This means plastic springs experience much higher stress at equivalent deflection, leading to rapid fatigue failure.

Why It's Hard

The fundamental constraint stems from PP's low elastic modulus (1.5 GPa vs 200 GPa for steel). Following Basquin's Law, fatigue life decreases exponentially with stress amplitude—plastic components operating at the same deflection as steel experience 130x higher strain. However, this analysis reveals the key insight: a 50% stress reduction yields approximately 100,000x fatigue life improvement. This makes geometry-based stress distribution the critical lever rather than material strength.

Governing Equation

N_f = C × (σ_a)^(-b) where b ≈ 3-10 for polymers (Basquin's Law)

Fatigue life (N_f) decreases exponentially with stress amplitude (σ_a). The high exponent (b) means small stress reductions yield enormous fatigue life improvements. This is why geometry optimization is more powerful than material substitution.

First Principles Insight

High viscosity is a feature, not a bug—leverage shear-thinning

Cosmetic serums typically exhibit pseudoplastic (shear-thinning) behavior where viscosity decreases dramatically under flow. At orifice shear rates of 500-2000 s⁻¹, effective viscosity drops 3-5x from the at-rest value. A 10,000 cP serum may flow like 2,000 cP through a properly designed orifice. This natural behavior provides dose control through yield stress while enabling dispensing forces compatible with all-plastic mechanisms.

What Industry Does Today

Metal spring pumps with PP housing

Limitation

Metal contaminates recycling stream; prevents mono-material recyclability

Low-viscosity reformulation to enable weaker springs

Limitation

Compromises product performance and consumer experience

All-plastic pumps for low-viscosity products only

Limitation

Cannot handle 10,000+ cP; limited to water-like formulations

Glass-fiber reinforced PP

Limitation

Improves stiffness but recycler acceptance varies geographically

Current State of the Art

Yonwoo[1]

Approach

Bellows geometry pump (all-PP)

Performance

5,000 cP at 500+ cycles demonstrated

Target

Commercial product available

Silgan Dispensing[2]

Approach

Glass-fiber reinforced PP pump

Performance

Estimated 8,000-10,000 cP capability

Target

Extended viscosity range

Aptar[3]

Approach

PP spring replacement designs

Performance

Low-medium viscosity applications

Target

High viscosity development

Oral care industry[4]

Approach

Squeeze tubes with duckbill valves

Performance

50,000+ cP proven

Target

Mature technology

[1] Commercial product

[2] Industry analysis

[3] Patent filings

[4] Industry standard

[1] Commercial product

[2] Industry analysis

[3] Patent filings

[4] Industry standard

Root Cause Hypotheses

PP modulus mismatch with metal spring design

90% confidence

All successful mono-material pumps use fundamentally different geometries (bellows, domes) rather than spring substitution

Viscosity specification assumes Newtonian behavior

75% confidence

Most cosmetic emulsions exhibit power-law indices of 0.3-0.5, indicating 3-5x viscosity reduction at flow shear rates

Premium positioning blocks simpler solutions

70% confidence

Oral care routinely dispenses 50,000+ cP through squeeze tubes; cosmetics rarely uses this format for premium products

Success Metrics

Dispensable viscosity

Target: 15,000 cP
Min: 10,000 cP
Stretch: 25,000+ cP

Unit: centipoise (at rest)

Dose accuracy

Target: ±10%
Min: ±15%
Stretch: ±5%

Unit: coefficient of variation

Cycle life

Target: 300 cycles
Min: 200 cycles
Stretch: 500+ cycles

Unit: actuations to failure

Cost premium vs. current pumps

Target: <15%
Min: <25%
Stretch: <10%

Unit: percent increase

Constraints

Hard Constraints
  • Mono-material construction (single polymer type for recyclability)
  • No metal components
  • Dispense 10,000+ cP viscosity product
  • Consistent 0.5mL dose (±15% minimum)
  • Compatible with existing filling lines
Soft Constraints
  • Premium aesthetic acceptable for prestige cosmetics
  • Actuation force <30N (comfortable for consumer use)
  • Cost premium <25% vs. current metal-spring pumps
  • Recyclable in standard PP stream (widely accepted)
Assumptions
  • Formulation exhibits shear-thinning behavior (power-law index <0.7)
  • Brand is willing to consider format changes if sustainability story is strong
  • Target recycling infrastructure accepts mono-material PP
  • Consumer will accept different dispensing experience for sustainability benefit
Success Metrics

Viscosity capability

Target: 15,000 cP
Min: 10,000 cP
Stretch: 25,000+ cP

Unit: cP

Dose accuracy

Target: ±10%
Min: ±15%
Stretch: ±5%

Unit: CV%

Cycle life

Target: 300 cycles
Min: 200 cycles
Stretch: 500+ cycles

Unit: cycles

First Principles Innovation

Reframe

Instead of asking 'how do we make plastic as stiff as steel,' we asked 'how do we design mechanisms that don't need steel's stiffness.'

Domains Searched
Oral care dispensing (high-viscosity squeeze tubes)Polymer fatigue engineering (Basquin's Law applications)Bistable mechanisms (snap-through domes)Origami engineering (fold-pattern amplification)Pharmaceutical unit-dose packagingCosmetic packaging patents

Solutions

We identified 6 solutions across three readiness levels.

Engineering PathProven physics, often borrowed from other industries. The work is adaptation, integration, and validation, not discovery.
R&D PathHigher ceiling, breakthrough potential, genuine uncertainty. Scientific or paradigm questions remain open.
Frontier WatchNot actionable yet. Technologies worth monitoring for future relevance.

Start with the Engineering Path. Run R&D in parallel if you need breakthrough potential or competitive differentiation.

Engineering Path

Proven technologies, often borrowed from other industries. The work is adaptation, integration, and validation, not discovery.

Solution #1Primary Recommendation

Calibrated Orifice Squeeze Tube with PP Duckbill Valve

TRANSFER
Bottom Line

Leverage shear-thinning rheology to dispense high-viscosity product through calibrated orifice. Duckbill valve provides one-way flow and prevents air ingress. Proven at 50,000+ cP in oral care—technical risk is near zero.

What It Is

A mono-material PP tube with calibrated orifice diameter (typically 2-4mm) and integrated duckbill valve. The user squeezes the tube, product flows through the orifice where high shear rate reduces viscosity, and the duckbill valve closes to prevent backflow and air ingress. For a pseudoplastic fluid with power-law index n = 0.4, viscosity at the orifice (shear rate ~1000 s⁻¹) is approximately 5x lower than at rest. A 10,000 cP serum behaves like 2,000 cP during dispensing, requiring only 15-25N squeeze force. Dose control comes from yield stress—product stops flowing when squeeze pressure drops below the yield point, providing natural cutoff without mechanical metering.

Why It Works

The rheology equation η = Kγ̇^(n-1) with n ≈ 0.3-0.5 for cosmetic emulsions means viscosity drops dramatically at high shear rates. Combined with yield stress providing flow cutoff, the system is self-regulating. The duckbill valve is a simple PP molding that flexes open under positive pressure and seals under neutral/negative pressure.

The Insight

Shear-thinning reduces effective viscosity 3-5x at orifice shear rates, making squeeze dispensing practical

Borrowed From

Oral care industry. Toothpaste (50,000+ cP) is routinely dispensed through squeeze tubes with precision orifices

Why It Transfers

Cosmetic emulsions have similar pseudoplastic rheology—same physics applies

Why Industry Missed It

Cosmetics industry associates squeeze tubes with mass-market products; premium brands avoided the format for positioning reasons despite technical superiority

Expected Improvement

Handles 50,000+ cP vs. 5,000-10,000 cP for current all-plastic pumps

Timeline

3-6 months to commercialization

Investment

$50-150K for tooling and validation

Why It Might Fail
  • Consumer/brand rejection of squeeze format for premium positioning despite sustainability benefits
  • Formulation may be Newtonian (n > 0.8) without shear-thinning benefit
  • Dose accuracy may not meet ±10% target without more sophisticated metering
  • Air ingress over product lifetime may cause oxidation/stability issues
Validation Gates
3-4

Rheology characterization and prototype orifice testing

$8-15K

Method: Measure viscosity vs. shear rate (0.1-1000 s⁻¹) to confirm shear-thinning; fabricate prototype orifices; measure squeeze force and dose CV

Success: Power-law index n < 0.7; squeeze force <30N; dose CV <15%

If formulation is Newtonian (n > 0.8), pivot to bellows pump approach

Solution #2

Optimized PP Bellows Pump

FEA-optimized bellows geometry distributing stress to achieve 300+ cycle fatigue life at 10,000 cP

What It Is

Bellows geometry replaces metal spring with accordion-fold PP structure. Stress is distributed across many fold lines rather than concentrated in a coiled spring. FEA optimization identifies wall thickness, fold radius, and number of folds to minimize peak stress while maintaining return force. Yonwoo has commercialized this at 5,000 cP; optimization can extend to 10,000+ cP.

Why It Works

Basquin's Law shows 50% stress reduction yields ~100,000x fatigue life improvement. Bellows geometry distributes stress across larger area than coiled spring, reducing peak stress. The approach trades material volume for stress reduction.

When to Use Instead

If pump format is absolutely required for brand positioning and squeeze tube is rejected despite sustainability narrative.

Solution #3

Glass-Fiber Reinforced PP Pump

Use GF-PP to increase modulus 3-5x, enabling higher stress at equivalent fatigue life

What It Is

Adding 20-30% glass fiber to PP increases elastic modulus from 1.5 GPa to 5-8 GPa. This allows smaller spring cross-sections at equivalent stiffness, or higher viscosity capability at equivalent geometry. Silgan has developed GF-PP pumps estimated at 8,000-10,000 cP capability.

Why It Works

Higher modulus means lower strain at equivalent stress, extending fatigue life. Glass fibers also increase tensile strength, allowing higher operating stress before yield.

When to Use Instead

If recycler acceptance of GF-PP is confirmed in target markets. Simpler development path than bellows optimization but recyclability depends on local infrastructure.

R&D Path

Fundamentally different approaches that could provide competitive advantage if successful. Pursue as parallel bets alongside solution concepts.

Solution #4Recommended Innovation

Bistable Snap-Through Dome Mechanism

Confidence: 50%

A PP dome that snaps between two stable positions—"up" and "down"—with each actuation. The snap-through motion is extremely fast (milliseconds), meaning stress is applied briefly rather than sustained. User presses dome, it snaps through expelling product, then user releases and dome snaps back drawing in air or next dose.

Fatigue damage accumulates with stress duration as well as amplitude. A 10ms stress pulse causes far less damage than 1s of sustained stress at the same amplitude. Bistable domes can achieve billions of cycles in switch applications; even heavily derated for fluid dispensing, 300+ cycles is readily achievable.

The Insight

Transient stress during millisecond-duration snap events vs. sustained spring stress changes fatigue calculations by ~10,000x

Breakthrough Potential

If it works: Could enable unlimited viscosity capability since actuation force is independent of spring return force

Improvement: 10-100x cycle life improvement over conventional spring mechanisms

First Validation Step
Gating Question: Will consumers accept snap-through haptics in premium cosmetic dispensing?·First Test: Fabricate prototype domes; conduct consumer perception testing (n=50) comparing snap vs. conventional pump·Cost: $20-40K·Timeline: 6-8 weeks
Solution #5

Unit-Dose Blister Array

Confidence: 55%

Eliminate pump mechanism entirely with pre-filled single-dose blisters

Ceiling: Perfect dose accuracy with unlimited viscosity capability; fully mono-material recyclable

Key uncertainty: Consumer acceptance of unit-dose format for daily-use cosmetics; perceived sustainability of "single-use" packaging

Elevate when: If pump-format solutions fail to meet cycle life or cost targets, and consumer research validates unit-dose acceptance.

Solution #6

Origami Fold-Pattern Bellows

Confidence: 40%

Geometric amplification through fold patterns enables unlimited viscosity capability

Ceiling: Theoretical unlimited viscosity capability through geometric amplification of small input motions

Key uncertainty: Manufacturing complexity for precise fold patterns at packaging cost targets; fatigue at fold lines

Elevate when: If conventional bellows optimization fails to reach 10,000 cP and manufacturing proves feasible.

Frontier Watch

Technologies worth monitoring.

Shape Memory Polymer Actuators

EMERGING_SCIENCE
TRL

2

Self-returning actuators using thermal or moisture-activated shape memory

Why Interesting

Shape memory polymers can provide return force without conventional spring mechanics. If activation can be tuned to ambient conditions, could enable fundamentally new pump architectures.

Why Not Now

Current shape memory polymers require heat activation (>40°C) incompatible with cosmetic use. Moisture-activated variants exist but response time is too slow (minutes vs. seconds needed).

Trigger: Publication demonstrating ambient-temperature, fast-response shape memory polymer

Earliest viability: 5-7 years

Monitor: Prof. Patrick Mather (Syracuse); shape memory polymer startups

Electroactive Polymer Pumps

PARADIGM
TRL

2

Electrically-actuated dispensing without mechanical springs

Why Interesting

Electroactive polymers change shape under electrical stimulus. Battery-powered pump could provide precise, repeatable dosing without mechanical fatigue concerns.

Why Not Now

Requires battery/electronics, dramatically increasing complexity and cost. Current EAP actuators have limited force output. Not compatible with mono-material recyclability requirement.

Trigger: Ultra-low-cost printed electronics enabling disposable smart packaging; high-force EAP development

Earliest viability: 7-10 years

Monitor: Printed electronics companies; EAP actuator developers

Risks & Watchouts

What could go wrong.

Consumer rejection of squeeze format for premium positioning despite sustainability benefits

Market·High severity
Mitigation

Strong sustainability narrative; premium material finishes; consumer testing early in development to validate acceptance

Formulation may lack shear-thinning behavior (Newtonian), eliminating viscosity reduction benefit

Technical·Medium severity
Mitigation

Rheology characterization as first validation step; pivot to bellows pump if n > 0.8

Recycler acceptance of glass-fiber PP varies geographically

Supply Chain·Medium severity
Mitigation

Confirm recycler acceptance in target markets before committing to GF-PP approach; prefer unfilled PP if feasible

Long-term fatigue may exceed accelerated test predictions

Technical·Medium severity
Mitigation

Run real-time fatigue testing in parallel with accelerated testing; design with safety margin on cycle life

Competitor solutions may already exist or be in development

Competitive·Low severity
Mitigation

Supplier conversations to understand competitive landscape; freedom-to-operate analysis if pursuing novel mechanisms

Self-Critique

Where we might be wrong.

Overall Confidence

Medium-high

High confidence in squeeze tube approach—this is proven technology requiring only positioning change. Medium confidence in bellows/bistable alternatives due to development risk. The key uncertainty is market acceptance rather than technical feasibility.

What We Might Be Wrong About
  • Brand may be unwilling to change format regardless of sustainability narrative—premium cosmetics positioning may override practical considerations

  • Formulation rheology assumptions may not hold—some serums may be more Newtonian than assumed

  • Consumer acceptance of novel haptics (snap-through, squeeze) may be lower than expected for premium products

  • Recycling infrastructure evolution may change the definition of "recyclable" over product development timeline

Unexplored Directions
  • Refill systems with reusable pump heads—shifts rather than solves recyclability challenge

  • Formulation viscosity reduction through rheology modifiers—addresses root cause but changes product

  • Take-back programs with refillable cartridges—different business model

  • Airless dispensing with collapsible inner bag—may enable lower actuation force

Validation Gaps

Consumer acceptance of format change

Status:Addressed

Consumer testing included in validation gate for squeeze tube and bistable approaches

Formulation rheology assumption

Status:Addressed

Rheology characterization is first validation step with explicit pivot trigger

Long-term fatigue vs. accelerated testing

Status:Extended Needed

Recommend parallel real-time testing; accelerated protocols may not capture all failure modes

Recycler acceptance in all markets

Status:Accepted Risk

Confirm major markets before launch; accept some geographic limitations

Assumption Check

We assumed your constraints are fixed. If any can flex, here's what changes—and what to reconsider.

Assumptions Challenged
Pump format is required
Challenge: Squeeze tubes with calibrated orifices dispense 50,000+ cP in oral care. The barrier to cosmetics is positioning, not physics.

If sustainability narrative is strong enough, squeeze tube format may be acceptable for premium cosmetics—solving the problem immediately.

Viscosity is fixed at 10,000 cP
Challenge: Shear-thinning formulations have much lower effective viscosity during dispensing. A 10,000 cP at-rest product may flow like 2,000 cP.

Rheology characterization should be first step—problem may be easier than the specification suggests.

Glass-fiber reinforced PP is not recyclable
Challenge: Recycler acceptance varies geographically. Some facilities accept GF-PP; others reject it.

If GF-PP is acceptable in target markets, Silgan's existing technology may already meet requirements.

Mono-material must mean single polymer
Challenge: Some definitions allow multi-layer structures if all layers are same polymer family (e.g., PP with PP-based adhesive)

Clarify recyclability requirements—may enable more design options.

Final Recommendation

Personal recommendation from the analysis.

If This Were My Project

Start with rheology characterization of the actual formulation ($2-5K, 1 week). If power-law index is <0.7, the squeeze tube path is wide open—this is proven technology at 50,000+ cP in oral care. The only barrier is brand positioning, which can be addressed with sustainability narrative and premium execution.

If the brand absolutely requires pump format, pursue bellows optimization with an experienced packaging engineering firm. Yonwoo and Silgan have demonstrated 5,000-10,000 cP; pushing to 10,000-15,000 cP is engineering optimization, not invention. Budget $200-400K and 12-18 months.

I would run consumer research in parallel ($15-25K) to validate acceptance of squeeze format and/or snap-through haptics. This de-risks the positioning question before major tooling investment.

The bistable dome concept is technically fascinating but I'd treat it as a parallel exploration rather than primary path—consumer acceptance of the unusual haptics is uncertain, and the squeeze tube solves the problem with proven technology.

Do NOT pursue origami bellows or shape memory polymers as primary path. These are interesting frontier concepts but add unnecessary development risk when simpler solutions exist.

By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies to improve your experience.